Here’s my deal with “The
Da Vinci Code,” the box-office smash based on the Dan Brown best-seller. Legions
of Christians gnawed their fists off because book and film dared shove an Easter
Egg history shocker that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene inside a ridiculous
10-cent thriller about a professor of (snooze) symbology. But why? Both open thusly: At
the Louvre, an albino monk assassin (!) point-blank
shoots an old man in the stomach, but grandpa rises and walks about, no blood, moving artwork and leaving arcane blue-light clues for the professor hero, and
THEN strips naked, and sprawls out Da Vinci Vitruvian Man style, and dies
without moving a twitch. If you can get past any of that to get pissy over
Jesus’ sex life, than you need prayer. And brains. And I just touched on the
plot holes. Some say “Code” attacks faith. Bull. It attacks thought.
The Bible, with all its wonder, is more logical. Ron Howard directs on
autopilot, Tom Hanks is adequate as the hero, and Audrey Tautou (“Amelie”)
tries out English as the heroine. The sole highlight: Hans Zimmer’s fantastic
score. It works miracles. D+
Saturday, June 22, 2013
The Da Vinci Code (2006)
Labels:
2006,
Audrey Tautou,
conspiracy,
controversy,
Dan Brown,
history,
Jesus Christ,
Mary Magdalene,
monk,
Paris,
religion,
Ron Howard,
Tom Hanks,
worst
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment