Showing posts with label Tobey Maguire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tobey Maguire. Show all posts

Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Great Gatsby (1974 and 2013)

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic novel “The Great Gatsby” has spawned roughly six filmed versions. I have seen only two, and it seems a movie version that equals the book is far and forever out of grasp. That is a reference to the book, which if you have not read is a shame. Because I’m skipping the plot re-hash. Read the book.

The 1974 version comes with high pedigree: Francis Ford Coppola has his name on the screenplay, and the top-line stars are Robert Redford and Mia Farrow, both at career highs, as the deeply unknowable titular character and the possibly soulless Daisy, she the woman of his desires/obsessions/ past. Sam Waterston is our hero/narrator, Nick. Redford as the make-you-swoon Gatsby? Cannot go wrong, right? “Well, of course you can.” This is a dud. My wife loves it. I don’t. The book zings with jazz and satire, hidden meanings, the notion that on your third read you catch new-to-you symbolism and connections. Never has an attack on excess come off as empty. Redford -– great actor -– is stiff and wrong as Gatsby, with Farrow over-acting the hysterics. Director Jack Clayton nails the look of the era of loud jazz, loose morals, and great wealth -– Gatsby’s house is the Rosecliff House in Newport, Rhode Island, and my wife and I have been there -– but it trudges along slow and empty. That moment at the end comes not as tragic and sickeningly ironic, but just tepid as … pool water. Dig, though, Scott Wilson as a wronged man. C

Baz Luhrmann’s version is all excess, an ironic eyebrow raiser as the novel attacks the very notion of flash and glitter as suffocating. Recall the absinth kicks of “Moulin Rouge!”? This “Gatsby” is all about that, in 3D. We open with narrator Nick (Tobey Maguire) as a novelist/patient inside a sanitarium, a wrecked shell encouraged to write of the incident that derailed his life: His dealings with mysterious Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio), waif cousin Daisy (Carey Mulligan) and her husband (Joel Edgerton). Yes, McGuire is playing Nick as Fitzgerald. How quaint. Luhrmann smartly mines deeper, fuller emotions, and DiCaprio nails the role of a delusional man who drops the term “old sport!,” but has no idea what it means, and does not know his life’s goal is a dead end. In a flip from the ’74 version, it is Maguire who is miscast, giving a “Spider-Man”-era wide-eyed, gawky performance that looks ridiculous on a man his age. The hip-hop fueled parties staged by Luhrmann drown satire, while the visual barrage of Nick’s written words floating in air reminded me of the quiet of reading a book. There is no quiet here. Only noise. C+

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Spider-Man (2002)

I still truly want to love the "Spider-Man" film. I had been waiting my entire geek life for a big screen adaptation worthy of the comic book exploits of my favorite superhero, and I got it in 2002. After all, I was vastly disappointed even at age 5 by a late 1970s TV film version. But I can't love this film. Despite director Sam Raimi ("A Simple Plan") pitching the ball high, and Tobey Maguire ("The Cider House Rules") is the ideal player for Peter Parker, the nerd who's bitten by a radioactive (or genetically altered here) spider and gains the ability to do whatever a spider can.

The film reaches a perfect Marvel highpoint in a dazzling scene where a distraught Parker, wearing jeans and a red sweatshirt, tracks the thug who shot his beloved Uncle Ben. Raimi and his VFX crew allow the viewer to feel like he or she is Spider-Man, swinging and leaping from one NYC skyscraper to the next. Then the hour mark hits, and the film just breaks apart with the full appearance of the Green Goblin. That would be Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborn -- the genius scientist and father of Parker's only friend Harry -- who's gone insane after an experiment gone wrong.

It's not Dafoe's fault. It's the damn costume -- metallic, cheap and with a helmet that looks like an inverted penis, the character is laughable bad. Each encounter between hero and villain grows more tiresome as you see Dafoe's near-hidden mouth mimic words behind this dumb mask that looks painful to wear. It kills the film.

Nit-pickling? Yes. But every comic book story rests not on its super hero but the villains he or she is pitted against, and this one fails. My disappointments here were corrected in the vastly better sequel. As the soon-to-be doomed Harry, James Franco skates circles around Maguire in acting and charisma. He's the breakout star here. B