I just re-watched
two Disney takes on classic stories: “Robin Hood,” from 1973, with foxes,
lions, chickens, and badgers in the lead roles, and “Peter Pan,” the classic
take that … well, defines everything I knew about Peter Pan growing up, and
even now.
Fact: This “Robin
Hood” is one of the first films I ever saw, and it’s still a bit of a gem,
perfectly pitched to the preschool set with cute, fun lyrics from a narrator
rooster and wonderful sight gags. Dig the way the animators let us see Robin
Hood dress in ridiculously easy disguises, and yet still fools the villainous
Prince John. It puts young viewers in the know, and I love that. Ditto the
animation, even though much of it is reused from “Jungle Book,” et al in a
cheap-o move. (That I notice means points off.) Pen and ink rocks,
and the bits with Prince John sucking his thumb would never work in CGI.
B+
“Pan,” now, is so
brilliant, so -– it *is* Peter Pan to me, and it’s wonderfully geared to both
the awe of children and whimsy of adults. Honestly, this film is 60 years old
and it feels eternal even if the costumes suggest we’re talking pre-1900.
Everything in this movie is my point of reference for every character, and I
cannot hold it against Disney. Why did I never pick up on the singing gay
pirate bit before? That’s a treat, that I can pick up on new stuff
on a 12th viewing. I love that Tinker Ball is quite an ass here, not
heroic, and Hook is just awesome, especially with Smee. That Peter Pan is both
hero and a brat, and Disney never pushes or preaches, he lets it play out, and
lets kids in the audience realize, you need your parents. Yes, the whole Red
Skin thing smacks a dumb move, a holdover from the classic book. But every
image here -– flying over London, the alligator –- is a marvel, it gooses a
40-year-old’s dreams. A
No comments:
Post a Comment